Huawei Headquarters, Shenzen, Guandong, China, Source: skynews.com |
Huawei is a Chinese multinational telecommunications equipment
and consumer electronics manufacturer headquartered in Shenzen, Guandong, China.
It was a company founded in 1987, initially focused on manufacturing phone
switches. It has since then expanded its business into building
telecommunications networks, providing operational and consultation services
and equipment both within and outside china, and manufacturing communications
devices for the consumer market.
Huawei is a business which has grown to become the world’s
largest telecommunications equipment vendor and is being considered as a
company with high security risks. Huawei’s
equipment being banned as nations seek to develop their 5G networks shows
little signs of stopping, and western bodies including the EU and NATO have
been called to establish a joint position on their security risks.
In the UK, the company’s bid to help build Britain’s 5G network
was approved by Theresa May, despite warnings about the risk it poses to national
security. Why wouldn’t Huawei be thought of as a high security risk to nations
if not because of assessments made of China’s hostility towards Western
nations.
Huawei’s equipment basically occupies every step of the
network chain between our laptops and phones through to the data centers
hosting the content we want to access. Huawei’s equipment is especially prominent
in the parts of the network closer to the data centers although it sells
laptops and phones, and it is the equipment which is raising concerns.
The company has been granted restricted access to build “non-core”
infrastructure such as antennas, but will be banned from involvement in the
most sensitive areas of the network with the main equipment it builds.
The core infrastructure devices that Huawei really deals with
– network switches, routers and bridges; the kit that controls how and where
data is sent, touches everything traversing the internet and are critical to
its proper functioning.
Three out of the five nations (the US of A, Australia and New
Zealand) in the five Eyes Intelligence Alliance have effectively prohibited the
installations of Huawei equipment as part of the next generation of
telecommunications equipment. While the other two members have not stated their
conclusion on the issue, the UK has made the decision to allow Huawei equipment
towards the edge of the network; in the radio transmitters and receivers which
other companies struggle to compete with the company on and Canada is expected
to state its position in the coming months.
The restriction of Huawei’s equipment to the edges of the 5G
network rather than the core data processing and handling areas is potentially significant
of how National Security Council (NSC) expects these risks can be managed,
although the ultimate decision was taken by the prime minister during one of
the NSC meetings.
Despite the assessment of the accusation of Huawei by the US
intelligence of being funded and sponsored by the Chinese state, and the UK’s
National Cyber Security Centre’s statement as regards the threat Huawei posed
to national security, the head of the NCSC said the UK has established the “toughest
and most rigorous oversight regime in the world for Huawei” and would be
capable of managing the risk the company poses.
The company has consistently insisted and affirmed its
consumers and the world at large in the face of criticism, that it has never
been brought to evidence that its equipment is more faulty or suspicious than
that of its competitors.
Even if there is no evidence of bad action on behalf of the
company, Western security officials have been especially wary of China’s
foreign policy, including its alleged ambitions to use business ties in foreign
countries as elements of warfare.
Asides the foreign policy, the founder’s connections with the
military and the communist party, alongside those of its senior executive
raises security concerns for foreign customers.
Networking equipment Source: skynews.com |
Huawei’s networking equipment could potentially facilitate
spying, although it has not been detected doing do. Any evidence that Huawei
equipment monitored or manipulated data it routed would lead to an immediate
response from all companies using it.
The question and worry posed now is if the West can include
Huawei’s equipment within critical national infrastructure and be confident it
would not be used against them.
No comments:
Post a Comment